RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter?

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter?
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:05:01 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Aug 23, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Bill Turner wrote:

> Not so. The "theoretical" bandwidth of ANY FM signal is infinite. The
> sidebands extend out forever. Check any book on FM theory, such as the ARRL
> Handbook. 

Yes so.  Sorry, but Kai is again correct.  

(Those who are not familiar with Dr. Siwiak can easily look up his work on the 
web.  He is new to the RTTY reflector, but not new to digital modulation 
techniques and methods.)

The spectrum tails of an FM signal may reach infinity, but there is also no 
"Lebesgue measure" in the tails.  Just think: if it really has infinite 
bandwidth, you would need infinite power, don't you?

You can always come up with an equivalent bandwidth for any signal that has 
finite power (what mathematicians call "square integrable").  ITU actually uses 
an equivalent "bandwidth that contains power within n-dB" concept.

The reasoning is the same as Zeno's paradox ("Achilles and the Hare").  
Achilles finally catches the Hare because the series is convergent.  The same 
is true with the spectrum of any signal that has finite power.  All practical 
signals have finite equivalent bandwidths.

Moreover, modern FSK techniques no longer even transmit a signal that bears any 
resemblance to an FM signal -- MMTTY, fldigi, 2Tone and cocoaModem all have 
non-constant output power.  Heck, even the K3 has non-constant output power in 
(gasp) FSK mode.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>