RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Self serving lies from the ARRL Letter

To: "'RTTY'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Self serving lies from the ARRL Letter
From: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:25:59 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Joe wrote: 
Since there is no way to file comments until the Commission assigns an RM 
number ... I recommend others file additional "Petitions
for Rule Making" that asks that the maximum bandwidth in the current MF and HF 
"RTTY, Data" allocations be set at 500 Hz -
"consistent with historical use of traditional radioteleprinter bandwidths" and 
other modern data modes such as PSK31, JT65A, JT9,
etc, and that wider bandwidth digital modes such as PACTOR 3, PACTOR 4, 
M110A/B/C, ALE, etc. be grouped with phone and image
transmission due to their 2.8 KHz compatible bandwidth.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

This is an excellent idea. I have actually been thinking about this very thing. 
I just don't know how to go about it. Anyone in this
group have experience in doing this? It certainly need to be well thought out 
and well written.

Or is this a good idea? What are the chances of there being enough comments 
against the present proposal to make the FCC turn it
down? Is it better to fight on one front or two?

Don AA5AU

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>