RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Hints and tips on how to file comments on RM-11708
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:58:43 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Nov 24, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

> If it is 2.4 KHz wide, it can not be legal ... how can one square
> 2.4 KHz occupied bandwidth with a rule that states a combined
> criteria of 1000 Hz and 300 baud which works our to 1500 Hz?

Joe, it looks like you are supporting what the ARRL has been saying about 
Symbol Rates :-).

By adding more tones (thus more bits per symbol) you can make the bandwidth as 
wide as you want, even if the Symbol Rate is fixed.  The bandwidth is therefore 
unlimited by the current rules.  The bandwidth of a signal is definitely not 
limited by Symbol Rate.  It is however related to SNR and the data (bit) rate 
(Shannon's Noisy Channel Theorem). 

This is precisely why I have been saying why I don't care if the Symbol Rate is 
raised, but I myself think it is unwise to use high symbol rates in a Rayleigh 
channel with multipath.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>