RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Response to ARRL request for inputs for new Band Plan
From: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Reply-to: ws7ik7tj@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:45:55 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Plenty of room. For example. 14.000 - 14.035 CW more than enough. 14.035 - 14.050 RTTY, 14.050-14.060 PSK31, 14.061 - 14.070 500 Hz. 14.110-14.150 wideband. RTTY just needs to move way down into the CW portion instead of the traditional crowd the top. Same on 80 it only seems constrained. 3.525. - 3.545 new RTTY area. Heck its really just how you look at things. Can't wait until the 9600 baud packet stations get going!

I am tired of ALE dumping all over the high portion of the digital area. After all CW is authorized anywhere in 14.000 - 14.350 let them move up and fight with the wideband automatic stuff which will really increase.


On 3/16/2014 9:29 AM, Anthony (N2KI) wrote:
Wideband will definitely become an issue. We already are squeezing into the
band plan as it is.  Unless the FCC plans on expanding the amateur
frequency allocations beyond their current boundaries, there is no arena
for wide band digital. There just isn't enough room.

Anthony (N2KI)


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>