> Do I understand you correctly that the ARRL withdrew the RM-11708
> petition?
No, they have not withdrawn RM-11708 although that would be the right
thing to do. They withdrew a *PREVIOUS* petition in which they had
asked that the FCC delete the entire table of specified emission types
and replace it with separate subbands for 200 Hz, 500 Hz and 3 KHz
modes.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 4/5/2014 11:32 AM, David Tanks wrote:
Hi Joe. Do I understand you correctly that the ARRL withdrew the RM-11708
petition? I do not see any reference to that on their website. Maybe I missed
it.
Thanks and 73, David AD4TJ
________________________________
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
To: rtty@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, April 5, 2014 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Info on RM-11708
They are not likely to take quick action. Remember ARRL's "regulation
by bandwidth" petition lingered quite a while without action before it
was withdrawn. ARRL have complained in the current "FCC restructuring"
process about the significant delays in action on amateur matters - see
the current ARRL Letter.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 4/4/2014 7:49 AM, Phil Sussman wrote:
Has there been any word on whether the FCC had
taken any action?
Thanks ES 73,
de Phil - N8PS
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|