RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] W1AW portables on JT65

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] W1AW portables on JT65
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 21:50:11 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
We just finished with Colorado. I would say it would depend on the band and how many ops you have doing digital. I don't have our final numbers but I could have worked lots more on RTTY. I personally made over 3700 contacts on SSB, CW and RTTY. 1400 SSB, 1100 cw and the rest RTTY. Approx.

AD1C pretty much took care of RTTY on 30m. 10/12 were pretty spotty which was a real bummer.

If you like JT65 then go for it. Seems like plenty of people are using that mode.

Mike W0MU

On 5/28/2014 9:25 PM, Don Hill AA5AU wrote:
Since this is the "RTTY" reflector, I think I already know what kind of answers 
I'll get with this one, but here goes.

I'm going to be operating W1AW/5 next week and will be doing a lot of RTTY. My 
thoughts are that I will not operate JT65 because of
how slow it is. I have worked other W1AW portable stations on JT65 but I just 
don't see the value in using a mode that takes 5
minutes to make one contact. Don't get me wrong, I really like JT65 and have 
over 1500 JT65 contacts in the log in the past 2 years.
But...

Is there any value at all to operating JT65 from W1AW portable operations? Does 
the rate get so slow toward the end that JT65 then
becomes acceptable in spite of its slow rate?

Thanks,
Don AA5AU



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>