RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:30:28 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Since N1MM is going through an upgrade I tossed this idea off one of the N1MM RTTY guys.

He said that the concept is pretty cool but he did not see a way to easily integrate in to the new program.


Mike W0MU

On 6/11/2014 10:27 PM, Kok Chen wrote:
On Jun 11, 2014, at 9:00 PM, Ed Muns wrote:

  OTOH, that part of the decoding algorithm is probably key to
2Tone's excellent copy of weak and other marginal signals.
The trade off between a "low-latency crummy decoder" and a "high-latency better 
decoder" can be solved if you allow new GUI elements into your modem.

Run two demodulators.  The low-latency one prints first.  The high-latency 
decoder then overprints over those characters when they become available from 
the high latency decoder.  This way, your eyes do not need to switch its focus 
between two windows.  Strong signals will print correctly right away.

Variations on this theme include using two different color fonts that produces 
a third color when the two decoders agree, etc.

I had discussed this technique before with G3YYD for making even longer latency decoders 
tolerable (for example, ones that corrects bit clocks by using "future" bits 
for pseudo-synchronous clocking).  But David is hobbled by the existing modem user 
interfaces.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>