It's time to e-mail your director again - and file additional comments
with the FCC - reminding both that wideband data has no place in the
spectrum reserved, in the Commission's own words, to "protect narrow
bandwidth modes from [asymmetric] interference from wide bandwidth
modes" for as long as the Federal Government has been regulating the
Amateur Service.
For references to your Director's e-mail address, the procedure for
filing comments with the FCC and general background information on the
issues involved free of ARRL "spin" and misinformation, please see:
www.saveCW.com or www.saveRTTY.com
Urge the Commission to reject this absurd and transparent attempt to
shoehorn PACTOR 4 into the present data spectrum and require ARRL to
present an allocation proposal that accommodates wide bandwidth data
among the other wide bandwidth modes *where it belongs* and protects
all users from automatically controlled stations run amok.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2014-10-02 3:17 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM
<wb2rhm@wb2rhm.com> wrote:
FYI:
See for info:
http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-executive-committee-to-meet-october-4
Skimmed it for "11708" but it's not there.
And that's because they don't call it by the docket number:
``Among important Amateur Radio proceedings still awaiting FCC action
that will come up for discussion are the League’s Petition for Rule
Making seeking a new allocation at 472-479 kHz ***and its petition to
replace symbol rate limits on data emissions below 28.3 MHz with a 2.8
kHz maximum occupied bandwidth***.''
Emphasis added.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|