On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Dave Barr <recordupe@verizon.net> wrote:
> Yes, there has been operation close to the upper limits, but never without
> very wide gaps below those top qrgs. Very easy to avoid psk and jt's
> without compromising room to operate.
>
> It would be very interesting to see a list of what frequencies the top
> scorers run on, as well as a frequency distribution chart incorporating data
> from all contest logs that do report actual qso qrgs.
I only have a 10 m dipole up right now (and a WARC trap dipole that I
probably could have loaded ..) so I was only on that band. Cabrillo
rounds your frequency so there is, in reality, more variation than
shows here, but regardless ... when I wasn't running on 28111.75 (yes,
that's why I chose it) I never heard anyone much higher than 28117.
Well, no one I could work. Yep, there's still another 183 kHz, but
ain't no body there. So you can make the argument, in fact I will,
that the other modes have plenty of room to spread out but don't.
done
28080 MHz: 2
28081 MHz: 3
28082 MHz: 2
28083 MHz: 2
28084 MHz: 2
28085 MHz: 2
28086 MHz: 2
28087 MHz: 2
28088 MHz: 3
28089 MHz: 42
28090 MHz: 1
28091 MHz: 2
28092 MHz: 6
28093 MHz: 1
28094 MHz: 2
28095 MHz: 3
28096 MHz: 1
28097 MHz: 3
28098 MHz: 1
28099 MHz: 2
28100 MHz: 1
28103 MHz: 3
28104 MHz: 2
28105 MHz: 1
28107 MHz: 1
28108 MHz: 1
28110 MHz: 2
28111 MHz: 6
28112 MHz: 158
28113 MHz: 1
28114 MHz: 1
28117 MHz: 1
--
Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|