RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY bandplan & JT65

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY bandplan & JT65
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:10:02 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

Did anyone realize the ARRL's HF plans are 30 years old and predate
any of the new modes - like PSK31/63/125, JT64/JT9, MFSK8/16, Olivia,
etc.?  Note the references to HF Packet and nothing about the
WINSTINK/CRAPTOR garbage generators.

There is far more up to date information elsewhere.

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 2015-01-07 6:44 PM, Rich Josephson via RTTY wrote:
I could really use a change of topic.  BUT, before that, I have one comment. Just do a google 
search for "RTTY Bandplan Contest".  One of the top results will be ARRL Bandplan page 
http://www.arrl.org/band-planWould you say an operator using this as a reference would be 
"good to go"?  Did you look it up - did you see the JT65 frequencies - no - how can that 
be?  What's a reasonable effort to avoid interfering with someone.     I keep a list for each 
contest I operate with frequencies to avoid (beacons and other modes) and JA frequencies.  I also 
have a band scope so I can see what's on a frequency (or adjacent) before calling CQ.  Of course 
not all modes will show up but at least I make an effort.  Since I don't have a super station or am 
a super operator, I usually call CQ up the band a ways - and fortunately (it seems) not on any JT65 
frequencies.   Maybe this topic could be put to rest and before the next contest someone could (in 
a pleasant tone) remind people of freque
ncies t
o avoid during RTTY RU. Richw0elt
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>