RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Question about NAQP rules
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 10:23:44 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Now that is the silliest thing I have ever heard. Why would we run more that 100 watts - cause we're cheaters? Why italicize 'you'? Are you singling out Biil?? 73
Tom W7WHY

On 2/26/2015 8:31 AM, steve wrote:


IF "you" used the KW amp, "you" would be running more then 100w at sometime...

73, steve WB3LGC

On 26-Feb-15 10:48 AM, Bill Turner wrote:
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)


That is the "what" of the rule. The question is "why".

As mentioned before, there are some ops who would prefer to run their
transceivers at a low power level to reduce stress on it and use an
amplifier to reach 100 watts.

As I recall, many Yaesu transceivers are NOT rated for 100 watts on
full duty cycle modes such as RTTY. Should these ops be forced to
compete at reduced power?  Or risk damaging their rigs in order to be
competitive?

This rule is silly and should be rescinded.

Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>