RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:04:51 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Do you abhor AFC in all of the multiple decoders that you using?

John KK9A

-----Original Message----- From: Ed Muns
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 4:08 PM
To: 'Jeff AC0C' ; 'Pete Smith N4ZR'
Cc: 'RTTY Contesting'
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contester preference - 1- versus 2-decimal-place spots

Good point about AFC.  I abhor that feature and never use it, so don't
consider it much.  To the extent spots are accurate to 2 decimal points
relative to the radio, then AFC would benefit S&P by reducing manual tuning.
I still shutter at the thought of this.   ;>)

Ed W0YK

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>