RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

To: RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
From: Kok Chen <rtty@w7ay.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 19:04:33 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
One approach to an RTTY contest is to send a checksum with the exchange.

Even a single character checksum will be reassuring to a recipient of the 
exchange, especially if the checksum is computed over the entire exchange, thus 
includes the callsign of the recipient, if the callsign was also sent as part 
of the exchange.

Add a checksum, and gone are the days when you have to send "AA5AU 599 123 123 
" or "AA5AU 599 OR OR " and instead just send something like "(AA5AU 123)X" or 
"(AA5AU OR)X", where X is the checksum character, which is just another Baudot 
character.  (You can even remove the newline character at the end of an 
exchange, HI HI.)

Or, "HNY 2016 DON (123)X", so the checksum only applies to the important part 
of the exchange.

Someone who is not using a compliant program, or who is using a real 
teletypewriter, can send a non-checksummed exchange.  Recipients who don't care 
can ignore that checksum character.

RTTY is a machine encoded/decoded data mode, why not take advantage of it?  We 
are basically today still using antiquated CW technology to send RTTY exchanges.

73
Chen, W7AY

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>