RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers

To: w6sx@arrl.net, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY Cut Numbers
From: "Kermit \(aka Ken\) via RTTY" <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:35:50 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Great idea!  
 
Even better, get rid of the silly TOO.  Who needs it?  Why shave  
milliseconds when you can chop them?
 
UE,
Ken, ABQJ
 
 
In a message dated 1/9/2016 00:10:36 GMT Standard Time, w6sx@arrl.net  
writes:

Cut  numbers for RaTTY.

We all recognize TOO for 599. So we should all send  TOO instead of
599--saves at least one SHIFT character.

Think of it,  163 ms saved for every RST.

But there's more. Cut numbers for exchange  NR. For example, YYR for NR 664.
Even more milliseconds saved.

Your  contest logger could easily take care of this--simple matter  of
programming.

Yee Haw! I'm going to be Dayton RaTTYer of the  year.

(Above all Tongue in Cheek.)

Diddle  Exuberantly,

Hank,  W6SX
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing  list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>