On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:16 AM, RLVZ--- via RTTY wrote:
> As a RTTY contester, I agree 100% with the need for more 80m. spectrum for
> RTTY. The need is so great that the technician class issue fails in
> comparison, so let's be careful not to encourage the FCC "to throw the baby
> out
> with the bath water".
If we fall for that oldest trick in the world, the politicians at ARRL have won.
For me, there are multiple separate issues here.
One of them is the change in RTTY occupancy on 80m.
Another one is to give access to RTTY on 80m.
These have no logical connection.
Until the ARRL separates them into two separate petitions, I will oppose the
single RM petition from the ARRL.
73
Chen, W7AY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|