RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] FW: callsign/callsign DQ

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] FW: callsign/callsign DQ
From: "John Barber" <john@bordertech.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:15:03 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Getting in to all this legality stuff with the licence conditions is for the 
contest adjudicators, not the crowd here. One sure rule in any contest is that 
you must use the same call all the way through. If you change your call, you 
start a new log.
John GW4SKA

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Noguchi via 
RTTY
Sent: 13 February 2017 22:55
To: Joe Subich, W4TV <lists@subich.com>; rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] callsign/callsign DQ

>If WE2ASS was indeed the operator, the entry should be examined


carefully and disqualified if any prohibited third party communication is 
discovered.  If the entry is single operator by NY6DX it's probably OK (except 
for the "unstable call").


That was a Multi-Single operation. How will the contest committee know which 
QSOs were made by WE2ASS (third party) and which were made by NY6DX (not third 
party)?

73, Ryan AI6DO   
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>