RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] callsign/callsign DQ

To: "Hank Garretson" <w6sx@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] callsign/callsign DQ
From: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 19:39:07 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Problem is Hank is that he originally started the contest just sending WE2ASS. No other call was used.

And agreed... That is the proper way to do it. See my earlier post where I used to do it as a Novice.

73
Jim W7RY


-----Original Message----- From: Hank Garretson
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 4:16 PM
Cc: RTTY Reflector
Subject: Re: [RTTY] callsign/callsign DQ

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

Is USACALL/USACALL even a valid "callsign" to send out over the air, ever?
(nevermind trying to determine if this person should be DQ'd or not)


ARRL Pacific Director W6RGG says it is valid.

WE2ASS/NY6DX is the FCC directed identification for a lower class licensee
to operate outside their assigned frequencies, using the call sign of the
higher class licensee acting as the control operator.  Nothing wrong with
it, and the award credit goes to the call sign as sent.


Contest Exuberantly,

Hank, W6SX
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>