RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Contacts vs Power and Skill in RTTY contests

To: K5ROE Mike <K5ROE@roetto.org>, "rtty@contesting.com" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contacts vs Power and Skill in RTTY contests
From: WILLIAM MARX <bmarx@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: WILLIAM MARX <bmarx@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 22:16:37 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Same hours?Bill
 

    On Monday, March 27, 2017 4:13 PM, K5ROE Mike <K5ROE@roetto.org> wrote:
 

 Of course you'd want to weight these numbers against the declining solar 
cycle values...


de K5ROE Mike


On 03/27/2017 01:00 PM, Tim Shoppa wrote:
> Just choosing my past 7 years in RTTY WPX, the power I ran, the number of
> contacts, and the score:
>
> 2012 - 100W - 334 Q's - 188K points
> 2013 - 400W - 689 Q's - 900K points
> 2014 - 400W - 973 Q's - 1300K points
> 2015 - 1500W - 1322 Q's - 2465K points
> 2016 - 1500W - 1508 Q's - 3003K points
> 2017 - 1500W - 1653 Q's - 3518K points
>
> My extrapolation is that a 4x increase in power results in about twice as
> many Q's. So a 15x increase in power (100W to 1500W) results in about 4
> times as many Q's.
>
> My antenna setup is nearly unchanged in the past decade so I can factor
> that out.
>
> Of course, my skills and enthusiasm and operating hours for RTTY contesting
> also grew over the past 6 years too. RTTY decoder technology has also grown
> too. So while the improvement hasn't been entirely due to power, I think my
> enthusiasm and enjoyment and on-time increased as I increased power in a
> very strong relation too.
>
> The concept that several have expressed here and elsewhere, that there is
> no skill in RTTY contesting, is very wrong. Maybe it might be skill-free if
> you only work the strongest stations that have perfect print.
>
> I work all kinds of weak stations that call me, requiring running multiple
> decoders in parallel and using my judgement and experience to piece
> together their callsigns and exchanges. While also using my ears to judge
> which print was more likely to be correct than the others in the face of
> QRM and QRN.  It's a much more visual experience than CW or SSB contesting
> and incorporating an additional sense to the activity is actually very
> satisfying and engaging.
>
> Tim N3QE
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


   
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>