RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 45.45-baud ASCII, 1000-Hz shift.

To: rtty@w7ay.net, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 45.45-baud ASCII, 1000-Hz shift.
From: Ed Sharpe via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Ed Sharpe <couryhouse@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 18:05:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
they  chose 60 wpm it  just happened to be that  baud  rate!
Ed#  www.smecc.org 
 
In a message dated 1/9/2018 2:40:14 PM US Mountain Standard Time, rtty@w7ay.net 
writes:

 
 The part I couldn't figure out is why the 1 kHz tone is pretty clean, 
harmonics wise, while the 3 kHz tone has a strong 6 kHz component.

In any case, the tones are not square waves. 

Without phase information, it is not possible to know the 3 kHz waveform. 
Perhaps recording the audio and playing back the sacalr waveform will show more.

Very curious why they chose 45.45 baud, other than the fact that there are an 
integral number of cycles per symbol, both for the 1 kHz tone and for the 3 kHz 
tone. Less keyclicks that way.

73
Chen, W7AY



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>