SD-User
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SD-User] SD ADIF Export

To: "Steve Harwood G4OWT" <g4owt@btinternet.com>, <sd-user@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [SD-User] SD ADIF Export
From: "OZ4RT, J Arnvig" <oz4rt@tdcadsl.dk>
Reply-to: "OZ4RT, J Arnvig" <oz4rt@tdcadsl.dk>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:45:56 +0200
List-post: <sd-user@contesting.com">mailto:sd-user@contesting.com>
That sounds right, although it should be SRX_STRING, as SRX is defined as a 
number.

I wonder where either would end up when imported into a logging program. If 
I were to do that, and really really needed the "RSGB" information, I think 
I would put it in the notes field.

73 ... John, OZ4RT

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Harwood G4OWT" <g4owt@btinternet.com>
To: <sd-user@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:46 AM
Subject: [SD-User] SD ADIF Export


> Having used SD 14.07 the weekend for the IARU contest I noticed the adif 
> export is incorrect.
> I am trying to import my log from SD from and the ITU fields are not being 
> populated correctly when the exchange was from a HQ station, it has been 
> truncated i.e. RSGB becomes RS in the ITU Zone field.
> The adif file looks like this
>
> <Call:5>GB7HQ        <Mode:3>SSB  <Band:3>40M  <Freq:5>7.060 
> <RST_Sent:2>59  <RST_Rcvd:2>59
> <QSO_Date:8>20080712 <Time_On:4>1654 <ITUZ:4>RSGB
> <EOR>
>
> ADIF defines ITUZ as a number, not a group of letters. SD's use of ITUZ to 
> convey this information is incorrect, should it not be <SRX:4> instead of 
> <ITU:4> ie  <SRX:5>VERON  and the other should be <STX>
>
> For the moment I did a find and replace on the ADIF file to change 
> <ITUZ:4> to <SRX:4> and the same for <ITUZ:5> etc
>
> Any thoughts on this one?
>
> Steve G4OWT


_______________________________________________
SD-User mailing list
SD-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>