Subject: | Fw: [SECC] Comments requested. |
---|---|
From: | AB4RU@aol.com (AB4RU@aol.com) |
Date: | Wed Jun 14 13:06:00 2000 |
Hi All, Sounds like the log checking is getting too complicated. I am certainly not in favor of throwing out any good qso's just because I was the only one to work a 3B2 on 160 meters in a contest. I think if the qso is thrown out the person has sending in the log should have the right to protest the QSO being removed and if he can offer proof of the qso it should be returned to the log with additional point credit. Ron -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/seccfaq.html Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com Search: http://www.contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Fw: [SECC] Comments requested., John T. Laney, III |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] Comments requested., thompson@mindspring.com |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: [SECC] Comments requested., John T. Laney, III |
Next by Thread: | Fw: [SECC] Comments requested., John Laney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |