Bill Coleman wrote:
>
> On 11/15/01 5:28 PM, K4SB at k4sb@mindspring.com wrote:
>
> >That has to be one of the more ridiculous statements I have ever
> >heard. If all club members are eligible, and I see no reason why ours
> >are not ( excluding the DX guys )
> >then how can that differ from a club roster?
>
> But, not all club members may be eligible.
k4sb- I see I should have been more specific and added outside the
circle to the exclusion of the DX guys. I did not think it necessary.
>
> For example, some may be outside the ARRL-defined circle. That's OK. They
> are still club members
k4sb OK, then let's complile a list of ONLY those within the circle.
That should meet the critirea.
>
> Another example, a club member may not have attended two "meetings" as
> required by the ARRL. Unfortunately, no one at the ARRL has defined
> exactly what constitutes a "meeting". The SECC has chosen to interpret
> this as either an in-person meeting and/or reflector participation. As
> such, most all members are eligible.
>
> >No wonder the number of log submissions are down.
>
> Well, Ed, first you gotta get on the air and work somebody! <grin>
I have. I have submitted scores for 4 contests this year, and that
does not include the CWSS, which I still have to submit.
>
> CU in SS Phone?
I'll get on for a few hours. Incidentally, I hate SSB.
);>
Ed
--
SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/
Submissions: secc@contesting.com
Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com
|