Subject: | [SECC] 160 plan |
---|---|
From: | w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI) |
Date: | Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:38:07 -0600 |
Now there is a revealing comment if I ever heard one. Dan/W4NTI > I also talked to the new FCC Chairman recently and his first question was > why don't hams work the new (more efficient...his words) > modes such as digital PSK31 and now digital voice? His feedback is that > PSK31 is far better than CW for weak signal and SSB is not even in the > ballpark! He told the group I was in that if amateur radio is to survive > with the existing frequencies (especially the UHF ones) we must start using > new modes. Amateur radio was the leader in SSB, packet and effective moon > bounce in the past. > -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] 160 plan, Bill Fisher, W4AN |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] 160 plan, Tom Rauch |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] 160 plan, Bill Fisher, W4AN |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] 160 plan, Tom Rauch |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |