SECC
[Top] [All Lists]

[SECC] Poor Operating?

Subject: [SECC] Poor Operating?
From: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel L. Jeswald)
Date: Sun Jan 16 17:02:16 2005
Yeah your right.  I apologize if I offended anyone.  But I still have a 
right to my opinions.

Dan/W4NTI

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "AE4Y" <ae4y@mindspring.com>
To: "SECC" <secc@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [SECC] Poor Operating?


>I haven't seen any evidence that the SECC is becoming elitist, nor have I 
>read any comments which suggest a bias in favor of big gun contesters as 
>opposed to those of us who participate with more modest stations.
>
> I'd suggest that the responses that your recent posts have generated are 
> due to the overzealous nature of your accusations that RTTY contesters 
> consciously engage in intentional interference and your apparent belief 
> that you (for reasons not readily apparent) are therefore justified in 
> using that same poor operating practice in retribution against them.
>
> That's difficult logic to follow.
>
> Kent, AE4Y
>
>
> Daniel L. Jeswald wrote:
>> Why should I be ashamed of myself?  Since when is it not proper to 
>> express ones opinion.  Or has the SECC turned into a club of the elite? 
>> Excuse me if I am not a big gun contester...perhaps I'll just take my 
>> puny scores and go somewhere else with them.
>>
>> Dan/W4NTI
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005
>
> 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>