I've been trying to not say anything about this thread, but I just can't
control my fingers. :>)))
You know, we complain when the FCC does no regulation, now are we
complaining because they are trying to do some regulation? Since the FCC is
making an effort to do some of the things that we have been complaining
about them not doing, I think the ARRL was correct in sharing the
information. If you got a request for one of your contest logs, from the
FCC, and they adequately explained why they requested it, would you really
turn them down?
I would not.
Tommy
W4BQF
-----Original Message-----
From: secc-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:secc-bounces at contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Dan/W4NTI
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 6:10 PM
To: K4SB
Cc: secc at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [SECC] fcc uses contest logs for evidence
You know something guys? That really is a low move from the ARRL.
I hate to say it but, maybe Baxter has a point.
Dan/W4NTI
----- Original Message -----
From: "K4SB" <k4sb at bellsouth.net>
Cc: <secc at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [SECC] fcc uses contest logs for evidence
>I saw nothing in the FCC letters which I thought inapproriate.
>
> What I did find absolutely disgusting is that the ARRL shared
> submitted logs with the FCC.
>
> So much for submitting contest logs.
>
> 73
> Ed
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.1 - Release Date: 4/20/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.1 - Release Date: 4/20/2005
_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
|