TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

[TRLog] Re: TRLog Digest V4 #304

Subject: [TRLog] Re: TRLog Digest V4 #304
From: n4af@contesting.com (Howard Hoyt)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 06:57:09 -0500

--------------040405020705000304050700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A couple:.

1)  Don't use it the first hour
2) After the first hour, you can TRY using SO2R, but may find it 
difficult. At the least, you have a quick method of
     band change.
I will predict that you will be hard pressed to exploit it in Sprint.

73, Howie

TRLog Digest wrote:

>TRLog Digest         Tuesday, January 22 2002         Volume 04 : Number 304
>
>
>
>In this issue:
>
>    [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>    Re: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>    RE: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>
>See the end of the digest for information about trlog-digest
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:20:30 -0500
>From: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
>Subject: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>
>Any hints for SO2R in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty new to SO2R in general,
>and it feels like it would be hard to make much use of a second radio for
>the first 2 hours at least.  Is this a situation where it might make sense
>to run the second radio solely in CQ mode on the next higher or lower band,
>while concentrating mostly on trying to work the traditional "couplets" on
>the first radio?
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>
>Sometimes a tower is
>just a tower
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:32:48 -0800
>From: Tree N6TR <tree@kkn.net>
>Subject: Re: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>
>>Any hints for SO2R in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty new to SO2R in general,
>>and it feels like it would be hard to make much use of a second radio for
>>the first 2 hours at least.  Is this a situation where it might make sense
>>to run the second radio solely in CQ mode on the next higher or lower band,
>>while concentrating mostly on trying to work the traditional "couplets" on
>>the first radio?
>>
>
>You have touched one of my favorite subjects!!  Prepare for a long
>response....
>
>First off - I don't really recommend two radios in the CW sprint
>unless you meet one of the following two criteria:
>
>1. You are a masochist.
>
>2. You have pretty much run out of "easy" things to do that can
>increase your scores.  
>
>Having said that - probably the biggest impact the second radio
>will have is an increase in your multiplier.  Getting two or
>three extra mults out of the second radio isn't hard to do.
>
>Using a second radio to actually increase your QSO total is a
>little harder to accomplish.
>
>You are correct about focusing on "couplets" on the band you 
>have the best rate on.  TR lends itself to calling a CQ while
>you are receiving an exchange in response to a CQ.  This lets
>you have a presence on another band without much (if any)
>sacrafice in rate.  
>
>If you imagine someone answering your CQ on the second band,
>you can now call CQ on the first band while receiving the 
>exchange.  If you can string several of these sequences 
>together, you are probably running at a rate faster than
>you can just doing couplets.  This doens't hapen very often,
>but when it does - it is pretty magical.  
>
>For me, I typically don't worry about the second radio in 
>the first hour.  I will then start using it some on 40 meters,
>and quickly reach the point where I can't really tell you which
>band I am "running" on.  After awhile, S&Ping on 20 will stop
>being very productive, and I will keep CQing on 20 until I 
>either get an answer, or find someone to call on 40.  
>
>I go "single band" again when I first hit 80, and sometimes 
>during the last 15 minutes of the contest because I start 
>to go crossed eyed and just need to focus on one radio again.
>
>Tree
>
>------------------------------
>
>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 18:02:50 -0600
>From: "Robert Brandon" <rbrandon@austin.ibm.com>
>Subject: RE: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>
>Tree has a great article on the TR web page.
>http://www.qth.com/tr/two_radio_sprint.html 
>
>I tried two radios in the last Sprint and could just feel the hair
>popping out on my chest.  
>
>Unfortunately, my score was not so manly.  8^)
>
>Good luck.
>
>Robert K5PI
>
>- -----Original Message-----
>From: owner-trlog@contesting.com [mailto:owner-trlog@contesting.com] On
>Behalf Of Pete Smith
>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:21 PM
>To: trlog@contesting.com
>Subject: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint
>
>
>Any hints for SO2R in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty new to SO2R in general,
>and it feels like it would be hard to make much use of a second radio
>for
>the first 2 hours at least.  Is this a situation where it might make
>sense
>to run the second radio solely in CQ mode on the next higher or lower
>band,
>while concentrating mostly on trying to work the traditional "couplets"
>on
>the first radio?
>
>73, Pete N4ZR
>
>Sometimes a tower is
>just a tower
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>- --
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
>Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
>Feature Wishlist:        http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of TRLog Digest V4 #304
>***************************
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
>Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  trlog-digest-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-trlog-digest@contesting.com
>Feature Wishlist:        http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
>

-- 
Howard Hoyt N4AF
http://www.qsl.net/n4af
Bluebird Trail
Blounts Creek, NC
27814



--------------040405020705000304050700
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
A couple:.<br>
<br>
1) &nbsp;Don't use it the first hour<br>
2) After the first hour, you can TRY using SO2R, but may find it difficult.
At the least, you have a <b>quick</b> method of <br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;band change.<br>
I will predict that you will be hard pressed to exploit it in Sprint.<br>
<br>
73, Howie<br>
<br>
TRLog Digest wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:200201230448.g0N4mkVw028475@contesting.com";>
  <pre wrap="">TRLog Digest         Tuesday, January 22 2002         Volume 04 
: Number 304<br><br><br><br>In this issue:<br><br>    [TRLog] SO2R in 
sprint<br>    Re: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint<br>    RE: [TRLog] SO2R in 
sprint<br><br>See the end of the digest for information about 
trlog-digest<br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br><br>Date:
 Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:20:30 -0500<br>From: Pete Smith <a 
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" 
href="mailto:n4zr@contesting.com";>&lt;n4zr@contesting.com&gt;</a><br>Subject: 
[TRLog] SO2R in sprint<br><br>Any hints for SO2R in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty 
new to SO2R in general,<br>and it feels like it would be hard to make much use 
of a second radio for<br>the first 2 hours at least.  Is this a situation where 
it might make sense<br>to run the second radio solely in CQ mode on the next 
higher or lower band,<br>while concentrating mostly on trying to work the 
traditional "couplets" on<br>the first radio?<br><br>7
3, Pete N4ZR<br><br>Sometimes a tower is<br>just a 
tower<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 
15:32:48 -0800<br>From: Tree N6TR <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" 
href="mailto:tree@kkn.net";>&lt;tree@kkn.net&gt;</a><br>Subject: Re: [TRLog] 
SO2R in sprint<br><br></pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">Any hints for SO2R in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty new to SO2R 
in general,<br>and it feels like it would be hard to make much use of a second 
radio for<br>the first 2 hours at least.  Is this a situation where it might 
make sense<br>to run the second radio solely in CQ mode on the next higher or 
lower band,<br>while concentrating mostly on trying to work the traditional 
"couplets" on<br>the first radio?<br></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre wrap=""><!----><br>You have touched one of my favorite subjects!!  
Prepare for a long<br>response....<br><br>First off - I don't really recommend 
two radios in the CW sprint<br>unless you meet one of the following two 
criteria:<br><br>1. You are a masochist.<br><br>2. You have pretty much run out 
of "easy" things to do that can<br>increase your scores.  <br><br>Having said 
that - probably the biggest impact the second radio<br>will have is an increase 
in your multiplier.  Getting two or<br>three extra mults out of the second 
radio isn't hard to do.<br><br>Using a second radio to actually increase your 
QSO total is a<br>little harder to accomplish.<br><br>You are correct about 
focusing on "couplets" on the band you <br>have the best rate on.  TR lends 
itself to calling a CQ while<br>you are receiving an exchange in response to a 
CQ.  This lets<br>you have a presence on another band without much (if 
any)<br>sacrafice in rate.  <br><br>If you imagine someone answering 
your CQ on the second band,<br>you can now call CQ on the first band while 
receiving the <br>exchange.  If you can string several of these sequences 
<br>together, you are probably running at a rate faster than<br>you can just 
doing couplets.  This doens't hapen very often,<br>but when it does - it is 
pretty magical.  <br><br>For me, I typically don't worry about the second radio 
in <br>the first hour.  I will then start using it some on 40 meters,<br>and 
quickly reach the point where I can't really tell you which<br>band I am 
"running" on.  After awhile, S&amp;Ping on 20 will stop<br>being very 
productive, and I will keep CQing on 20 until I <br>either get an answer, or 
find someone to call on 40.  <br><br>I go "single band" again when I first hit 
80, and sometimes <br>during the last 15 minutes of the contest because I start 
<br>to go crossed eyed and just need to focus on one radio 
again.<br><br>Tree<br><br>------------------------------<br><br>Date: Tue, 22 
Jan 2002 18:02:
50 -0600<br>From: "Robert Brandon" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" 
href="mailto:rbrandon@austin.ibm.com";>&lt;rbrandon@austin.ibm.com&gt;</a><br>Subject:
 RE: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint<br><br>Tree has a great article on the TR web 
page.<br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://www.qth.com/tr/two_radio_sprint.html";>http://www.qth.com/tr/two_radio_sprint.html</a>
 <br><br>I tried two radios in the last Sprint and could just feel the 
hair<br>popping out on my chest.  <br><br>Unfortunately, my score was not so 
manly.  8^)<br><br>Good luck.<br><br>Robert K5PI<br><br>- -----Original 
Message-----<br>From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:owner-trlog@contesting.com";>owner-trlog@contesting.com</a> [<a 
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="mailto:owner-trlog@contesting.com";>mailto:owner-trlog@contesting.com</a>] 
On<br>Behalf Of Pete Smith<br>Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 4:21 PM<br>To: <a 
class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:trlog@contesting.com";>trlog@conte
sting.com</a><br>Subject: [TRLog] SO2R in sprint<br><br><br>Any hints for SO2R 
in the CW Sprint?  I'm pretty new to SO2R in general,<br>and it feels like it 
would be hard to make much use of a second radio<br>for<br>the first 2 hours at 
least.  Is this a situation where it might make<br>sense<br>to run the second 
radio solely in CQ mode on the next higher or lower<br>band,<br>while 
concentrating mostly on trying to work the traditional "couplets"<br>on<br>the 
first radio?<br><br>73, Pete N4ZR<br><br>Sometimes a tower is<br>just a 
tower<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>- --<br>FAQ on WWW:               <a 
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog";>http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog</a><br>Submissions:
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:trlog@contesting.com";>trlog@contesting.com</a><br>Administrative 
requests:  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com";>trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com</
a><br>Problems:                 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:owner-trlog@contesting.com";>owner-trlog@contesting.com</a><br>Feature
 Wishlist:          <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html";>http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html</a><br><br>------------------------------<br><br>End
 of TRLog Digest V4 #304<br>***************************<br><br><br>--<br>FAQ on 
WWW:               <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog";>http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog</a><br>Submissions:
              <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:trlog@contesting.com";>trlog@contesting.com</a><br>Administrative 
requests:  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:trlog-digest-REQUEST@contesting.com";>trlog-digest-REQUEST@contesting.com</a><br>Problems:
                 <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" 
href="mailto:owner-trlog-digest@contesting.com";>owner-trlog-digest@contesting.com</a><br>Feature
 Wish
list:     <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html";>http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html</a><br><br></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="$mailwrapcol">-- 
Howard Hoyt N4AF
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" 
href="http://www.qsl.net/n4af";>http://www.qsl.net/n4af</a>
Bluebird Trail
Blounts Creek, NC
27814</pre>
    <br>
    </body>
    </html>

--------------040405020705000304050700--


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions:              trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist:         http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TRLog] Re: TRLog Digest V4 #304, Howard Hoyt <=