TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Fw: [Trlog] Display of actual QSO totals

To: "TR-Log" <trlog@contesting.com>
Subject: Fw: [Trlog] Display of actual QSO totals
From: "Rolf T Salme" <rolf.salme@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:55:32 +0100
List-post: <mailto:trlog@contesting.com>
Hi Bob & Charlie,

My collected wisdom in life is that it is considerably 
simpler to work calling dupes instead of facing a heated
discussion in the middle of a pile-up whether this is the 
1st, 2nd, 3rd or so QSO. TR-Log will put a zero in the pts 
column anyway, right or wrong, and I am prepared to live 
with that. 

73,
Rolf
SM5MX, XV7SW etc

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bob Tellefsen 
To: Charlie Ocker ; TR Log Reflector 
Sent: 08 December 2003 20:18
Subject: RE: [Trlog] Display of actual QSO totals


Hi Charlie
They may also have an error in their logging software setup.
I think I'm guilty there too, as I found 5 dupes after the
contest, and I usually have one or none.  I must have
some dupe alarm disabled, because I wasn't seeing as many
dupe flashes in TR as I expected.
73, Bob N6WG

-----Original Message-----
From: trlog-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:trlog-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Charlie Ocker
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:08 AM
To: TR Log Reflector
Subject: [Trlog] Display of actual QSO totals


During this past weekend's ARRL 160 contest, I had TR (v6.74) configured 
to "work dupes in run mode" because it was quicker and easier to work 
'em again than to send the "qso b4" message.

I noticed, however, that the running QSO total included these dupes. 
The on-going score calculation was correct, as expected.

I think it would be very useful if the displayed QSO total did not show 
dupes.  It would give the operator a better idea of how he/she is 
actually doing.  Correct me if I'm wrong; I've been using TR since v3.83 
way back in the early 90's and seem to recall that the displayed QSO 
total used to work this way.

FWIW, I had something like 40 dupes in my log.  Many of these stations 
called me repeatedly.  I don't know if this is normal for 160 contesting 
or not.  Maybe they were casual ops who didn't use logging software?

73,
Charlie  N9CO

_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>