TRLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Trlog] Request - remove the sidetone

To: Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com>
Subject: Re: [Trlog] Request - remove the sidetone
From: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 06:15:42 -0700
List-post: <mailto:trlog@contesting.com>
Martin - can you verify that you can turn off the tone with the Control-J
setting?  (CW TONE).

If you can - you can simply put the command:

CW TONE = 0

in a STDCFG.DAT file (locate it where the TR program is) and that will
become you new default.

Tree N6TR

On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 2:10 AM Martin Kratoska <martin@ok1rr.com> wrote:

> I have a Microham DXP here that includes a K1EL version 3.1 chip. It
> works very well, in TR4W with Wine the monitor is turned off after
> starting the program. CQRlog - the monitor is turned off after startup.
> It is enabled only in the TR Log, ported for Linux. Why?
>
> I don't understand why it's not the other way around - by default the
> monitor is turned off and who needs it should turn it on. TR Log for
> Linux behaves exactly the opposite of other programs. Why? I don't
> understand those who want it this way...
>
> Under these circumstances, I have no choice but to either modify the
> relevant piece of code myself or continue to ignore TR Linux and give
> priority to TR4W with Wine.
>
> 73,
> Martin, OK1RR
>
>
> Dne 07. 06. 22 v 1:47 George Fremin III napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 10:55:53AM +0200, Martin Kratoska wrote:
> >
> >> can I ask to remove everything concerning sidetone (monitor tone)
> >> from the winkeyer support routine? It is not needed, there is
> >> already the radio sidetone. Why should the keyer beep on the table?
> >
> > I disagree - I think there are times when someone might want to make
> > the keyer sidetone to work.  I just had one here - I do not have a
> > radio hooked up but it was a great way to play with the software and
> > prove that I am sending code to the keyer.
> >
> > And you can, as a user, turn off the sidetone in the winkeyer with the
> > ctl-j menu setting.  It seems better to have the user in conrol of
> > that and have it work just as it does now.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trlog mailing list
> Trlog@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
>
_______________________________________________
Trlog mailing list
Trlog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>