TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] QRP

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] QRP
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 12:17:00 -0700
Interesting note.

When I joined the "original" QRP International club back in 1963 (member 
number 870), the definition of QRP was < 100 watts.  In fact the 
membership certificate had a stylized power meter (actually the 'Q' in 
QRP) on it indicating 100 watts.


Reid, K7YX


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: [TenTec] QRP
Author:  "Nr5q@aol.com" [SMTP:Nr5q@aol.com] at MSXGATE
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date:    6/12/98 9:41 AM


I suppose I belong to a fast disappearing group of old timers who think of
the 
Omni, Corsair, Paragon, and other 100 watt class transceivers as a QRP rigs
as 
delivered. Anything under 100 watts is QRP to many of us. I am sure it is
more 
difficult to get out with 5 watts or under...but it would be even more 
difficult to get out using a dummy load, or underground antenna.

Please help me understand. I am being perfectly sincere--this is not meant
to 
be a "cute," or smart-alec type letter...What is the big deal about buying a

good rig and then making it work as poorly as you can?

73,


Brucee, NR5Q

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm 
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com 
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>