TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] ARRL proposal

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] ARRL proposal
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 11:53:00 -0700
Yeah, and from all the way out here in Oregon I could see the smoke 
rising from their computer when it received the first of my many to come 
replies.

I guess this would mean Ten Tec will no longer have to include keyers in 
their rigs because soon no one will be able to send or receive fast 
enough to need one!!!  Gee, I think I could send and receive 12 WPM the 
day I was born!

Reid, K7YX
A true Extra, not an "easy Extra (Class A)"


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: [TenTec] ARRL proposal
Author:  "Jim and Kate Belt" [SMTP:jkbelt@spiritone.com] at MSXGATE
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date:    7/22/98 11:00 AM


Hi All:
While this is only marginally related to Ten Tec products it is of MAJOR 
significance to amateur radio. Please go to the ARRL Website and read the 
outrageous proposal that they are making to the FCC. There is a place for 
comments. I stopped writing mine when the keys on my computer keyboard got 
too hot to touch.
73,
Jim K7JIH


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm 
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com 
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>