Hi Bill,
I've checked all my previous messages and found in no way one could
understand I had sent them the whole device.
Maybe I used too small a font and thus confused your absorption.
There's a lot of ways anyone can discredit everything. That's the life.
So, no blame on you.
The only thing why I posted all that was to show the other profile
of ten-tec. As you well know both may very well be co-existent.
And they are, apparently, in this case.
Besides,
The fact no one from them (ten-tec) really bothers what I've been
writing about,
might give you some more possibilities to think about,
to you, a keen between-lines reader, Bill...
See you,
Alec/SP2EWQ
Bill wrote:
> Hello Alec,
> I guess my behavior to you might seem odd but, I think my assumptions
> are well founded. The story is changing daily so when I say "theres
> more
> to this ....." , there is.
> You seem like a reasonable fellow so Im sure you will understand its
> a
> tough job to fix a rig piece by piece. I think if one of my rigs went
> down and I tried to replace it part by part , it would be hit or
> miss...
> I wonder when your experiences took place.What are the dates?
> By the way , I send this to the entire list because there seems to be
> more than a little interest in this story. It is not typical of the
> experiences of the major owners of TenTec equipment.Far from it.
> Bill W2CQ
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|