TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] electron flow vs. current flow

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] electron flow vs. current flow
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:43:47 -0700
Yup, and then there is that little guy sitting on the electron who swears
that he isn't moving at all and that it's the "electron deficient" atom that
is moving.  Whereas the little guy sitting on the "electron deficient" atom
disagrees and states that it is not he but the electron that is moving.
It's all relative.

Reid, K7YX

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael O. Hyder [mailto:N4NT@chartertn.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 8:38 PM
To: Dan
Cc: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] electron flow vs. current flow



The holes are where an electron isn't.  If electrons flow clockwise in a
circuit then the holes flow counterclockwise.

Regards, Mike N4NT@chartertn.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan" <tacquire@earthlink.net>
Cc: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] electron flow vs. current flow


|
| What is the current in this case really referring to?  Could the holes be
the
| neutrons?  I have read that the positive side is abundant in protons.
|
| Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX wrote:
|
| > Yep, this is kind of like a vacuum cleaner.  According to Webster, a
| > vacuum is "a space with nothing in it at all".  Therefore, how can a
| > cleaner clean a space with nothing in it?
| >
| > So electrons go from negative to positive and current goes from positive
| > to negative.  What happens to the neutrons?
| >
| > 73
| > Bob K4TAX
| >
| > Dan Cox wrote:
| > >
| > > hehe, it's really amazing that the myth ever got started.  Supposedly
it was
| > > easier around the turn of the century to explain electricity if you
| > > explained it in the reverse of how it actually works..  Imagine these
| > > people's confusion when they started learning about vacuum tubes for
| > > instance!  The logic just DOES NOT work!!
| > >
| > > ----- Original Message -----
| > > From: "Sherrill WATKINS" <SEWATKINS@dgs.state.va.us>
| > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
| > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 10:47 AM
| > > Subject: [TenTec] electron flow vs. current flow
| > >
| > > >
| > > > A friend of mine, who is a cathodic protection engineer, states that
in
| > > the cathodic (corrosion) protection business,  he installs sacrificial
| > > anodes on buried gas piplines to protect against corrosion.  He also
states
| > > that  current flows from the positive to the negative pole but
electrons
| > > flow from the negative to the positive pole!  -  Sherrill   k4own



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>