TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Possible cause of dupe messages...

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Possible cause of dupe messages...
From: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:43:39 -0800
Aaron;

It's happening here in Oregon too.  Most of the Ten Tec messages I read last
week were sent out again over the weekend.  Over the years I have come to
ignore this minor annoyance since it happens so frequently on these eMail
lists.

Reid, K7YX

-----Original Message-----
From: Hsu, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hsu@unistudios.com]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:18 PM
To: 'tentec@contesting.com'
Cc: 'owner-tentec@contesting.com'
Subject: [TenTec] Possible cause of dupe messages...



Just some FYI...

On the Roxio reflector (the software subsidiary of Adaptec), they're having
similar dupe post problems.  They've isolated it to servers run by
RoadRunner (rr.com) and RR techs are working on the problem.  Seems to be
affecting parts of Texas, OK, and Louisiana and possibly other states.
Apparently, some RR servers are re-submitting messages several times and, in
some cases, multiple "already submitted" error messages are also being sent
back to the originiator of the message.

This might be the same problem that contesting.com is/was experiencing.
We'll see what happens over the next couple of days.

73,

  - Aaron Hsu, KD6DAE
    [athsu]@unistudios.com
    [kd6dae]@arrl.net
    No-QRO Int'l #1,000,006
     . -..- - .-. .-   " .... . .- ...- -.-- "


...and now back to our regular Ten-Tec discussions...

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>