TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Jupiter Input (One more thing)

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Jupiter Input (One more thing)
From: pywacker@fuse.net (pywacker@fuse.net)
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 06:20:25 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: <pywacker@fuse.net>
To: "TenTec Mailing List" <tentec@contesting.com>; <w3nr@vol.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: Jupiter Input
Ed

In my review I also mentioned receiver overload problems on 40 and 80. As
mentioned the only solution I see is to engage the ATTN.
It does appear to work

73 de KE4WY Jim

> Ed
>
> Remember some improvements or changes to the rig can be accomplished by
> flash updates. Since it's introduction TenTec has added a Noise Blanker
and
> a Speech processor.
>
> Please note on the 12 items I listed.
>
> Could Possibly be changed by flash
> Item 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10
>
> ((Item 1 probably won't be changed and not a serious issue))
>
> Corrected
> Item 4 & Item 11
>
> Not Sure but probaby won't change
> Item 8 and Item 12
>
> ((I don't like the way item 8 was handled but not a serious issue))
>
> ((My feeling, Item 12, if you put a transmit Monitor on a rig you should
be
> able to hear difference in mic's and bandwidth changes...Maybe they
> will do better next time))
>
> Just a comment ..This was not a problem......actually a wish
> Item 9
>
>
> 73 de KE4WY Jim
>
>
> Thanks to all for their comments on the Jupiter. Really makes for a tough
> decision. I was surprised at the amount of negative comments. More than
> what was expected. But as some would say "What do you expect for $1200".
> 73 thanks again
>
> Ed W3NR
>
>
>
>



--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>