Bill, I think that you have point up very well that the misnomer
"software-defined" is really not the same as "software-controlled."
Too many manufacturers and a lot of innocent hams are confusing the two
terms with the end result that any radio which involves software *control*
is being touted or viewed as software*defined* - the two are completely
different in architecture and operation. A basic limitation on the software
configurability of any radio lies in the analog circuitry which seldom can
be changed much if at all by software command.
The radio architecture is what it is and at least thus far, the majority of
our radios, even the DSP variety, provide only limited configurability by
software.
The notion that a software radio is forever with only occasional software
upgrades is a pleasant one but one whose time has not yet arrived - unless
the ORION is a *real* surprise!
72/73/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas
Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe
Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56th year and it just keeps getting better!
QRP-L 1373 NETXQRP 6 SOC 262 COG 8 FPQRP 404 TEN-X 11771
Icom IC-756PRO #02121 Kachina #91900556 IC-765 #02437
All outgoing email virus-checked by Norton Anti-Virus 2002
Bill Meahan wrote:
>
> This does bring up an important point: with "software-defined" radios,
> the ham community is pretty much reduced to programming external control
> programs unless and until the manufacturer(s) release source to their
> internal DSP code or provide some alternate method of altering the
> behavior of the DSP istself. Want to change the AGC time constant(s)?
> Unless a menu choice is provided (I think TT does) you're out of luck.
> No easy equivalent to changing a resistor or capacitor value. Want to
> muck about with alternative mixers? Same problem. Worse, actually, since
> at best you could only choose from a list provided by the manufacturer.
> The days of "mods" largely come to an end.
|