Hi Tim -
My solution, have one of each.
I still like the Corsair II for some things, but I use the OMNI VI more
often because it is simply more stable. Heck, I prefer my TS 850 for
most SSB exploits, but the OMNI VI is not far behind.
Clark
WA3JPG
On Sunday, February 2, 2003, at 07:19 AM, <tlogan7@cox.net> wrote:
> One of my thoughts in giving a Corsair II a trial run was that it did
> not
> have DSP or a PLL and was almost a 1/3 less in cost than a used Omni
> VI+. I
> had the impresseion that some people's experience with noise from the
> PLL
> and DSP was a negative in the Omni VI+, while the added features of dual
> VFO's (w/o having an external module), memories etc, made up for that
> internal noise. I know on paper what it says, but many of you may have
> graduated from a Corsair II to an Omni VI+ - which, who knows, maybe I
> will
> too - so I would be interested to know if any of you VI+ owners even
> remotely missed the Corsair because of the above items. I suspect not,
> but I
> am curious. 73/Tim NZ7C
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|