TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] QTH.net Ten-Tec group
From: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 16:22:15 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Jim Lowman has done a great job administering the Ten-Tec reflector groups. I belong to this one and the QTH group. I find the QTH group's postings are more focused and concise, whereas we can--and do--get into near-philosophical threads on this reflector that can seem endless. Also, I don't recall seeing any flames on the QTH site. Remember the working over W5YR got here a while back?

All in all, I think both reflectors serve a useful purpose, but I don't have to administer them.

John, W3ULS

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>