RE: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review

["Keith Lodahl" <lodahlkh@charter.net>]

I wonder about all the traffic about this as well.  Some folks like to
debate this stuff to death.  Others are just trolling.  It's getting a
little old for me.  Sounds like the endless debates between Ford and Chevy
zelots.

Keith Lodahl
KB9NUM NNN0ACS NNN0GCE ONE
ARRL Official Emergency Station
ARRL Public Information Officer
ARRL Volunteer Examiner
920-387-4675
kb9num@charter.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Art Searle
> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 7:39 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review
>
>
> Paul wrote:
> > As a practical matter, Orion's slight shortening on the
> first keyed element
> > is not perceived to the listener, provided that all
> remaining elements in
> > the keyed series are of normal length.
>
> I don't see why you all are making such a big deal about
> this.  Looking at the Keying Waveform in the Expanded Report
> (which is calibrated at 10 ms divisions) the foreshortening
> is about 40% at 60 wpm.  Would it be fair to assume that at
> 30 wpm the foreshortening might only be 20%?  I doubt it you
> could hear that.
>
> Yuri wrote:
> >. . . but you could send code with your foot switch . . .
>
> Yes, but only if you use your left foot!  :)
>
> 73,
> Art
> W2NRA
>
> PS And I don't have to defend the Orion; I don't own one.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec