TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question.

To: Rick@dj0ip.de, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Not TT - Wire antenna question.
From: ac5e@comcast.net
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 01:02:33 +0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Chuckle: Well, Rick, I cooked the balun in an MFJ 989 a dozen years ago, 
running a few hundred watts on 75 from a Hercules I. It stank something 
terrible. 

I also cooked the roller inductor running 100 watts from my Paragon to a wire 
antenna on 17 Meters. I tired of stinking tuners rather quickly so I changed to 
Ten Tec 238's and have had no further trouble. But I haven't tried to feed a 
comparatively low impedance antenna with twinlead again either. 

I generally agree with you, Rick, especially trimming the loop to resonance on 
40 and then opening the loop opposite the feedpoint for 80/75. That will 
provide predictable feedpoint impedances on all the harmonically related bands 
from 80 up and very nice and predictable results. 

I also concur that if you are going to use twinlead by all means use a balanced 
antenna tuner. 

However, it's not always possible or convenient to use anything except a random 
length loop and the tuner one already has. Most of the random length loops I 
have tried (on bands where more than a half wavelength of wire was up) had 
feedpoint impedances in the 10-250 ohm range with minor excursions both up and 
down. Leading to a 5:1 max SWR at the feedpoint and correspondingly less for at 
transmitter end of the transmission line. And reasonably low coax losses as 
long as the length of line is kept fairly short. 

For such situations a choke placed VERY close to the feedpoint will cool the 
coax shield down to the point a ferrite balun will finish the job quite well. 
For "all bands" use two, one of 6-8 turns on a 100 mm form to be active on 20 
and up, the other of 12-15 turns for the lower bands, oriented at right angles 
with as little space between them as possible. 

Or use the smaller choke and back it closely with a ferrite balun. Any of those 
combinations cool things down in a hurry. 

That said, my standard practice, down here in the semi-tropics, is to go 
straight from the feedpoint balun to a ground mounted lightning arrestor with a 
ferrite balun on the shack side of the arrestor. But I get between 100 and 120 
lightning days a year and that's probably overkill in the higher latitudes. 

The one thing not to do is to run any appreciable length of coax between a 
ferrite balun and the antenna. A friend tried that - against my warning - and 
his smoke detector pretty warned them quickly enough to save his house. If your 
transmission line shield is close to a quarter wave most remote mounted ferrite 
baluns will get very hot, very quickly. Not good. 

And I suppose I had best say that's my two pice. At least on that subject. 

73  Pete Allen  AC5E
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>