> justification in my mind. Though if we are to have a Low cut
control,
> it would be dandy if the graphical representation reflected its
> effect.
It does.
Here it is with no LOW cut:
http://home1.gte.net/nq5t/Misc/DSCN2893.jpg
And here it is with LOW cut active:
http://home1.gte.net/nq5t/Misc/DSCN2894.jpg.
It's consistent across modes, and doesn't really matter what the
initial bandwidth, etc. is. Looks right to me, with a tolerance of a line
width or two on the high end of the response display, as I mentioned
before.
Still don't understand why our two essentially identical radios don't
work the same way.
One thing I would like to see changed with the "cut" control is to
have a long press restore the conditions that existed BEFORE cut
(either high or low) was invoked. Although the issue is not so
simple -- since BW or PBT may have been used in the meantime,
and there may be both Hi and LOW cuts used, etc. -- so what the
heck would you restore to?
Perhaps a "read my mind" interface would help --- :-)
Grant/NQ5T
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|
