| To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP |
| From: | "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:47:21 -0600 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
The general rule of filtering ANY signal is to do so as early in the receiver chain of circuits as possible. The bandwidth needed to pass all the RF signal limits the filter sharpness there, and you can get sharper filtering at the IF; after shifting the signal frequency. Finally, filtering after the detector can be used for audio bandwidth filters, but does nothing to prevent or mitigate an overloaded detector responding to other signals in the IF bandwidth than the one desired. 73 Stuart K5KVH |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] FS Omni VI+, William Winscott |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [TenTec] Owning a Volvo?, Charley Moore |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP, whip wilson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] IF DSP vs. AF DSP, Ben K8DIT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |