TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues
From: "Reed O. Krenn" <reed_ww3a@alltel.net>
Reply-to: reed_ww3a@alltel.net, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:56:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Well, at least this thread was aptly titled: 'Sensitivity Issues'.

Too bad they had little to do with the equipment.................

Reed / WW3A
Most Humble Pledge to the Ten Tec Worshippers Cult

On 25 Feb 2004 at 20:37, K3BU@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 2/25/04 7:25:23 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
> reed_ww3a@alltel.net writes:
> 
> >>As opposed to *what*,  the "Yuri knows better" syndrome?<<
> 
> I am getting really tired of this atmosphere here. I try to address the 
> subject, provide explanation and suggestions for improvement. As a response I 
> get 
> "imaginary reality" and the above crap.
> 
> You wanna worship your homebrewy boxes, keep singing that emperor has new 
> clothes, by all means. You really don't need me or anyone pointing out 
> deficiencies and offering improvements. 
> 
> Yea, what do I know. 46 years of contesting, over 20 world records, 40 years 
> of (IBM) award winning design experience, numerous modifications and 
> improvements to rigs, obviously does not measure up to what you know. 
> 
> Sayonara!
> 
> Yuri, K3BU, VE1BY, VE3BMV
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>