TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 80m antenna suggestion
From: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:36:32 -1000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Pete,

A fattened (cage) dipole is broader band than a skinny dipole, and I did not think they were lossy.

Ken

ac5e@comcast.net wrote:

Chuckle - even back in prehistoric times we knew the only way to broadband a dipole is to make it lossy. However the reduction in field strength, while greater than a typical trap or loading inductor, is not that great. My FS tests show it to be a dB more or less.




_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>