TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits
From: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:06:09 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Don,
I was just trying to see how seriously some were taking this matter.  Having
spent many years in QA and having to respond to customer concerns, I am well
aware of the need to be responsive to such.
73, K4VMO

----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Sachnoff" <kx9q@arrl.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:59 PM
Subject: [TenTec] ditsnbits


> I am not sure if K4VMO is being facetious or not, however, consider for
> the moment that if I were to invest a significant amount of money in a
> product and I had issues I would certainly like to be kept aware that at
> least my issues were received and hopefully something was being done
> about them.  Even an automated response as mentioned elsewhere is a
> start.  It is incredible the respect a company receives by at least
> acknowledging receipt of an issue.  Whether they do something about it
> or not is another issue.
>
> Don - kx9q
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>