| To: | mm3kdz@beeb.net, tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] RE: Corsair II warble |
| From: | Allan Henry Kaplan <w1ael@mindspring.com> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:56:02 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
|
Bob, the point about the age of the Corsair design is well-taken, BUT
the different performance on a band-by-band basis makes me suspect the
band heterodyne crystals and/or any components of them which change from
band-to-band. Ten Hertz may raise comments on PSK, but it is not bad
for Corsair. Ten-Tec service may have some more specific ideas based
o0n the band-sensitivity of this warble. Hope this helps. 73, Allan, W1AEL _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II warble, Bob Towers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Transmitter, Receiver, or Rig, wherefore art thou "Radio"?, Allan Henry Kaplan |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] OT: Radios? Why are they Radios? (Was Radio debate), James Duffer |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Transmitter, Receiver, or Rig, wherefore art thou "Radio"?, Allan Henry Kaplan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |