TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] BPL Update

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] BPL Update
From: Steve Weber <kd9bo@mac.com>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 06:57:53 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Pete,

I understand your plight. Competing against cheap labor in China is nearly a losing battle, especially when American companies no longer consider themselves to be American companies, but rather multinationals.

Treason can be defined as giving defense secrets to other countries under false pretenses, but in today's climate, dismantling the only non-asian manufacturer capable of producing a critical, irreplacable guidance system component for our key weapons systems is simply considered to be good business practice, not treason.

Run a google search on the words MAGNEQUENCH and CHINA to learn about what many consider to be the worst example yet of an American company engaging in treason. A keyword search on MAGNEQUENCH at the insightmag.com website will turn up three articles that may make your skin crawl. http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=search

I applaud you for your efforts to stay American!

Thank you Pete!

73 de KD9BO Steve

ps: before anyone flames me for going off topic, please do the search and read the links. Then write to your Congressmen and Senators in outrage.



Well, said, Doc. I'm a manufacturer in a small industry who has watched most of my competition go "offshore" because of the utterly reckless actions of a relatively small number of political appointees. And when you want to place blame for offshoring, do the arithmetic. Then do the research.

It takes three to five years between the boardroom decision to move a plant until enough product has made it onshore to start issuing layoff slips. Who was in office three to five years ago? What were the policies that made major employers look overseas? Why were those policies in place? And why did the then administration fail to address those policies?

The people we elect haven't a clue about what's going on - unless we tell them. And even when we tell them, forcing a bureaucrat to reverse course takes an act of Congress. A few who serve "at the will of the President" can be removed - provided said crony does not provide enough money to the incumbents
re-election campaign, or to the financial markets, to make in inconvenient to tie a can to his tail. And provided the appointees actions do not represent the political philosophy of the President.


All in all, the Founders - and Plato - gave us a wonderful system of government. And what we have now is the fruition of a 227 year long scheme to subvert that system. In large part by exporting the very foundation of our success and our economy - our jobs and our technology.

73 Pete Allen AC5E



In this election season where everything seems to be presented or
 interpreted as having partisan purpose we seem to find ourselves
 parsing every word.  An after-effect, I suppose, of the Clinton-Gore
 years when all of we non-lawyers learned about new word games like
 "It depends what your definition of is is." and "There is no
 controlling legal authority."  Sigh.

 So that we might address our E-mails, letters, and phone calls to
 the correct individuals can you specify precisely whom it is in
 this administration you know with certainty to be "highly in favor
 of BPL", please?


Generalizations work against us in this campaign to inform the uninformed and to derail this RFI trainwreck, only specifics are of value.

IMHO, YMMV ...

 --
 Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
 West Central Florida
 Op. Atlas, Drake, Hallicrafters, TenTec ...
 p.s. Linux-incompatible hardware is defective!
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 _______________________________________________
 TenTec mailing list
 TenTec@contesting.com
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


--
Steve Weber


No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.

*******************************

Hey spammers - Harvesting email addresses? Don't overlook these guys!

FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell: mpowell@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Kathleen Q. Abernathy: kabernat@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Michael J. Copps: mcopps@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Kevin J. Martin: kjmweb@fcc.gov
FCC Commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein: jadelste@fcc.gov

US Postal Service: customer@email.usps.gov
Fraud Watch: fraudinfo@psinet.com
Federal Trade Commission: consumerline@ftc.gov
Federal Trade Commission: uce@ftc.gov
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>