TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Broadband over Powerline (BPL)

To: president@whitehouse.gov, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] Broadband over Powerline (BPL)
From: Arthur Bernstein <n2ka@optonline.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:00:36 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Dear Mr. President,
I'm writing to you today because I am very concerned about an issue that may have numerous negative ramifications for us as a nation.
Specifically, there is in the works, a new technology called Broadband over Powerlines or BPL, for short. As you are probably aware, the premise behind this technology is the easy and allegedly economical access to the Internet for those in this country who are not served by high speed Internet services such as cable or DSL.
Coming from a technical background, I have come to discover that this technology, wherein broadband signals carrying Internet activity will be transmitted over exposed power lines, is indeed a faulty and ill conceived technology. It is a technology that HAS BEEN SHOWN to produce wideband and indeed potentially wideranging interference to communications systems, be they military, commercial, public safety (such as FEMA), amateur and others. This interference is not to taken lightly. In these days of national vigilance against our enemies from abroad, we DO NOT need any aiding or abetting our enemies from within our borders! This technology WILL compromise communications systems due to the interference it creates. This interference will mask the intelligibility of urgent signals. Basically BPL is an unlicensed system creating interference to licensed services (Part 15.) Notching or selective filtering of these signals has not been shown to be effective. Furthermore, the maintenance and upkeep for preventing interfernece to other services would be a monumental and not economical process. Ignoring this fact will be disasterous!! Whatever economic gains there might be for the power companies involved, are far overshadowed by the detriment offered to National Security. This is very short sighted in its scope. It is my feeling that too many people in government, including FCC Commissioner Powell, are just not attuned to the technical side and instead have been locked into the potential economic gains of this technology. Regarding economics, it appears that the startup and maintenance costs for this technology will be considerable. In order to be competitive with other Internet services, these costs will have to be absorbed some place. Surely NOT by the subscribers. In all liklihood, the costs will be passed on to the ratepayers of electric service, whether they use BPL or not. Now that's just NOT fair. It's UN AMERICAN!
Mr. President, my voice is a small one. There are over 293 million small voices in this great land. Let's preserve our national security and great nation.
God Bless.
Sincerely,
Arthur Bernstein


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>