| To: | <TenTec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TenTec] BPL & Security |
| From: | <k4dlj@bellsouth.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 5 May 2004 9:10:24 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Bill, I agree. We need to focus on progation. The folks at any of the concerns have no idea what propogation is. What really appears interesting to me is why there has never been mention of the data transmitted by BPL, is it secure to the consumer. It certainly be decoded if heard. It would be real interesting to be sitting on 80 meters decoding the BPL data in LA from a BPL site is Washington, DC or anywhere else for that matter. --... ...-- Dave K4DLJ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] COME SEE US AT DAYTON, Bill Rowlett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] subject added...rig specs, tongaloa |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] skywave BPL interference, ac5e |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments, Don Rasmussen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |