| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments |
| From: | Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Wed, 05 May 2004 18:16:02 -1000 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
There is also no question that when BPL is identified as causing harmful interference to a licensed service it must be shut down, under existing rules. The problem is that the BPL promoters and the FCC (excuse me if that sounds redundant, I am thinking back to days when the FCC remembered what it's job is) would rather just deny the interference and forget about having to protect licensed services from interference.There is no question of BPL being legal to start up, under existing part 15rules, just how it should be regulated and measured. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments about BPL, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] BPL Comments, Ken Brown |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments about BPL, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments, Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |