TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better?

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better?
From: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 17:02:38 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yea, noticed that too.

The top 10 rigs, in order of 2kHz Dynamic Range Data, as per this report on
receiver performance are:


Orion (1kHz roofing filter) =  92 dB
Drake R-4C (600 Hz roofing filter) = 83 dB
R-390A =  79 dB
IC-7800 = 78 dB
Omni V = 76 dB
IC-775 = 76 dB
Omni VI+ = 75 dB
IC-781 = 75 dB
Omni B = 74 dB
IC-765 = 73 dB


73
Bob, K4TAX

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <WB3LGC@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better?


> The thing I find impressive in the Sherwood report is that 50 year old
> technology (AKA R-390A) does better then most of the current rigs...
>
> 73, Steve
>
> In a message dated 7/7/2004 3:47:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> RMcGraw@Blomand.Net writes:
> I have a test data sheet from Sherwood Engineering that shows the IC-746
> having 20KHz (99dB) and 2KHz (70 dB) Dynamic Range Data. Also there is the
> IC-746Pro data which 20KHz is 97dB and 2 KHz is 70dB.
>
> FYI the Omni VI+ 20KHz test data is 97 dB and 2 KHz test data is 75 dB.
>
> Here's the link if you are interested.
>
> http://www.sherweng.com/Dayton_2004/Dynamic_Range_Data.pdf
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>